Go-live is not the finish line. Yet many enterprise transformations treat it as such — celebrating deployment, disbanding teams, and moving on. Then, weeks later, the reality sets in: performance issues, user resistance, operational gaps, and a growing backlog of "unexpected" problems.
This pattern is predictable, avoidable, and rooted in how transformation programmes are scoped, governed, and transitioned.
The problem: delivery ends where operations begins
Most transformation programmes are structured around a single milestone: go-live. Success is defined as "system deployed on schedule and within budget." What happens after — stabilisation, adoption, optimisation — is treated as someone else's problem.
This creates a dangerous handover gap. The delivery team, who understand the system's quirks and dependencies, leave. The operations team, who inherit responsibility, lack context. And the business, who expected transformation, gets disruption instead.
Why stabilisation is not optional
Stabilisation is the phase where a deployed system becomes a working system. It involves:
Without dedicated stabilisation, organisations face extended periods of instability, workarounds, and eroded confidence. Users revert to old systems. Executives question the investment. And the transformation stalls.
What good stabilisation looks like
Effective stabilisation is not ad-hoc firefighting. It requires:
1. **Planned stabilisation window**: A defined period (typically 8-12 weeks post-go-live) with dedicated resources and clear exit criteria.
2. **Retained delivery capability**: Core delivery team members remain engaged to resolve issues, tune performance, and support operations.
3. **Operational readiness**: Operations teams are trained, documented, and supported — not just handed a system and wished luck.
4. **Governance continuity**: Programme governance extends through stabilisation, with clear escalation paths and decision rights.
5. **Business engagement**: Business stakeholders stay involved to validate outcomes, refine processes, and drive adoption.
The cost of skipping stabilisation
Organisations that skip or under-invest in stabilisation pay for it later:
- Extended disruption: Issues that could be resolved in weeks persist for months.
- Increased support costs: Lack of operational readiness leads to expensive, reactive support.
- Failed adoption: Users lose confidence and resist using the new system.
- Delayed benefits: The transformation's intended outcomes remain unrealised.
In extreme cases, organisations abandon the new system entirely, reverting to legacy platforms at significant cost.
Practical recommendations
If you're planning or leading an enterprise transformation:
- Scope stabilisation explicitly: Include it in programme plans, budgets, and governance.
- Define exit criteria: What does "stable" mean? Set measurable thresholds for defects, performance, and user satisfaction.
- Retain key delivery resources: Don't disband the team on go-live day. Plan for phased transition.
- Invest in operational readiness: Train operations teams early. Provide documentation, runbooks, and support.
- Measure outcomes, not just deployment: Track adoption, performance, and business value — not just "system live."
Conclusion
Go-live is a milestone, not a finish line. Enterprise transformations succeed when they deliver not just deployed systems, but stable, adopted, and value-generating platforms.
Stabilisation is not an afterthought. It's the phase where transformation becomes reality.
*Related services: <a href="/services/technology-advisory" class="text-primary hover:underline">Technology Advisory</a>, <a href="/services/delivery-assurance" class="text-primary hover:underline">Delivery Assurance</a>*
Discuss your transformation challenge
Get in touch to explore how we can support your programme.